SLR Movies
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 12:36PM
Who is making the movie in this picture?
SLR stands for Single Lens Reflex, “reflex” meaning that the viewfinder shows you the scene through the taking lens by reflecting the light onto a groundglass. The mirror that does this moves out of the way when the shutter is released, contributing to the distinctive SLR shutter sound. In a digital SLR, that same mirror blocks the view to the sensor, making it impossible to preview the shot on the LCD screen.
Lately, this inherent design quality of SLRs has been called into question, as manufacturers realize that temporarily stowing the mirror, eschewing the optical viewfinder and providing a live LCD view has some occasional advantages. It lets them use their fancy contrast-detecting autofocus and face-detection madness, it more accurately previews things like lens boke and white balance. It provides a comfort factor for recent point-and-shoot converts.
And it allows the capture of movies.
That last bit is something that no one has taken advantage of until now. Nikon just announced the D90, which among many impressive features sports not only live view but the ability to capture 720p HD movie files.
The recently cease-and-desisted canonrumors.com has some specs, rumored of course, for the long-awaited Canon 5D MarkII. They include, among other things, a movie mode. Further speculation includes the notion that said movies might be 1080p. I had been wondering what it would take to get me to consider upgrading my 5D, and that would just about do it.
If you study the sensor size cheat sheet, it’s easy to see why folks would be excited by an SLR with movie mode. Most HD cameras have sensors no bigger than an aspirin. But a DX-sized sensor is nearly identical to the Super35 motion picture film gate. You’ll find sensors of this size in the Panavision Genesis, Arri D20, and other unpurchasable digital cinema cameras. The affordable option with a sensor this big is the RED One at $17,500 (body only). So desirable is the shallow depth-of-field look that clever folks such as Redrock Micro have created quite an industry around adapters that allow SLR lenses to be used on various HD cameras. Those adaptors, however, can cost as much as the D90 body.
The sample movies we’ve seen so far from the D90 tell this story perfectly.
The D90’s movie modes are apparently all hard-set to 24 fps. I once had a meeting with some execs and engineers from Nikon, at which I begged them to allow 24fps movie modes on P&S cameras. So I’m just going to go ahead and take a tiny bit of credit for this amazing fact. Not 15 fps, not 30 fps or 60. 24 lovely film-like frames per second. I don’t know what we filmmakers have done to deserve this from both Nikon and Panasonic in such close succession (the LX3 also has a 720p24 HD movie mode), but keep it coming guys. Canon, if your alleged 5D MkII movie mode doesn’t support 24p, then it’s of much less interest to filmmakers.
Many people have pointed out that autofocus won’t work during the D90’s movie capture, thus making it “useless.” Apparently they are unaware that professional film and video shooters almost exclusively use manual focus. If autofocus is occasionally of use on a video camera, it’s because it is designed to work with moving subjects. SLR autofocus is concerned with speed, not smoothness, so it would probably create jarring results in motion as it snapped from solution to solution. The ability to manually focus during movie capture is not something the D90 or a similar offering from Canon could easily disable, since it’s a physical property of the lens. Manual focus during movie capture is a good thing, even if the LCD display on the back of the camera will make critical focus a bit tricky. You could always pipe the HDMI out to an HD display.
Mark my words, you will see rail-mounted D90s with follow-focus rigs and outboard HD displays. And you thought the HV20-based frankenhoopty rigs were ugly.
But there are limitations with the D90’s movie mode that are likely to be endemic. These SLR movies are compressed, heavily. They may or may not be in a format that your NLE of choice supports. The D90 has a limit of five minutes of recording time at 720p.
But probably the biggest potential problem is that there’s no indication of manual control over exposure in these movie modes. I could imagine the aperture remaining locked, but dpreview’s D90 preview explicitly states that exposure in movie mode is automatic. This means troublesome changes in exposure when lighting changes, probably achieved by varying shutter speeds. SLRs have mechanical shutters that are uninvolved with the movie mode, meaning that we will likely have no control over the shutter interval of the movie recordings. We’ll have razor-sharp staccato motion in sunlight and video-like 360 degree shutter indoors, and pulsing exposure settings remeniscent of the worst vacation camcorder strafing. Lame. That’s really the dealbreaker to me. No one will make anything but fun little experimental videos with an auto-exposure-only camera.
(UPDATE: See the first comment below for some hope-inducing contradictions to this concern!)
And that may suit Canon just fine. As Russell Heimlich points out, Nikon doesn’t make video cameras, but Canon does. Canon may well feel compelled to protect their HD video camera line. They may also, like Panasonic, understand filmmakers well enough to outfit their still cameras with movie modes that are interesting and fun, but (carefully) unsuited for any kind of professional work. Or maybe, just maybe, Canon is uniquely poised to unite their SLR expertise and their strong HD camera history into real competition for RED. I get giddy just thinking about a Scarlet-priced, full-frame sensor Canon HD camera that uses my L glass. It sounds crazy but it’s a few short jumps away.
So will you be making a film with your SLR any time soon? Probably not. But you’ll very likely be making movies with it. And if folks like Nikon, with no consumer HD camera line to sabotage, understand the importance of 24 fps, maybe they’ll come to understand the need for manual exposure control as well; in which case the reasons not to shoot your DV Rebel epic with an SLR continue to dwindle.
Preorder the D90 or the LX3 from Amazon and support ProLost.
Check out the follow up post.
Reader Comments (11)
There is some info from people that looked at pre-production models via a photographers blog that full manual control of iris, shutter, ISO etc. is available (and DP review has added exposure lock available).
I think this might actually be the new rebel camera of choice, double system sound. My aged DVX100a may finally go on the chopping block once I have a chance to play with one.
Thanks for that Stephen v2! Very interesting indeed—I'd love a link to that blog if you have it.
I think the blog Stephen is referring to is http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2008/08/chase-jarvis-raw-advance-testing-nikon.html
Several people has asked on the blog if the exposure is controllable/lockable, and Scott r. (who I believe is one of testers of the D90) said "...The exposure is lockable in D-Movie mode, no jumpy auto exposure changes."
Heh, the very blog I linked to in my post. I guess I didn't read all the comments. Thanks Espen!
Exposure locking isn't quite the same thing as explicit shutter speed control (ask any HV20/30 user), but it's close. Maybe close enough.
there may also be a heat issue which may explain the is a five minute limit. basically the camera is running at full tilt: CPU, sensor bus, memory. it's one thing to have a camera go, snap, snap, snap... delay. but it's another thing to go: click, wrrrrrrrrr [five minutes goes by], CUT!
we know from the astro photography guys work in CCDs that the longer they are exposed to light the more cooling they need to get consistent photon captures. without cooling they get like blooming from some parts of the sensor.
it's too bad that nikon isn't a more open platform because with some profile hacking and some body rework it could be an interesting platform.
that 5 minute limit is purely due to taxation issues in the EU, as confirmed by Nikon.
I for one am very excited by this direction and I have seen the merger of the two digital worlds coming. I thinks it's important to reiterate that Nikon has nothing to lose with this and a new market to gain. I can see firmware in our future.
-gl
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is sound. The D90 must have an on-board mic, or more likely no mic at all. I for one would love to have a dSLR/ movie camera so I can ditch the camcorder at home while out and about. These movie dSLR's will never replace tried and true camcorders, but they sure would be a lot of fun to have.
Have you guys seen this:
http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18278
From the title of the post, I immediately thought of Tony Donoghue, who I had the pleasure to meet this weekend. He's making films from DSLR stills and heavy post-production. It was exciting for met to see Tony's technique in action since I'm focused on the tools creative people use, and the technique is simple enough to teach almost anyone (minus the work in post).
His short "A Film From My Parish: 6 Farms" features 6 of the farm interviews he's conducted, and I believe he's half way through the 100 that he has planned.
http://www.reelireland.ie/shorts_2008.htm
BTW, if anyone is interested, you can get re-housed film-style F-mount lenses from P+S Technik. So if you want to mount a FF unit or some other cinema-oriented accessories on your Nikon, that wouldn't necessarily work as well on a non-modified Nikkor Lens, that option is available.